in August 24th, the tiktok overseas Tiktok filed a lawsuit against the Federal District Court of California, accusing the Trump administration of breaking the administrative order involving the company and its parent company bytes. Tiktok said in the indictment: we have no choice but to take action to protect our rights in the unfair treatment we have suffered. In the 39 page indictment, tiktok said that as early as October last year, some U.S. congressmen proposed to the Committee on foreign investment in the United States to require tiktok’s action against U.S. companies in 2017 Musical.ly The acquisition is subject to national security review. After < / P > < p >, tiktok has been actively providing relevant data and solutions to CFIUS, but the committee refused to contact and communicate with tiktok’s lawyers. < p > < p > at 11:55 p.m. on July 30, just five minutes before the Commission’s statutory review period, the Committee on foreign investment issued a statement saying it was convinced that tiktok would acquire in 2017 Musical.ly The statement did not provide evidence of a national security risk. < / P > < p > the work of the Committee on foreign investment in the United States (CFIUS) is to review commercial transactions and ensure that they do not pose a threat to national security. If the Commission has doubts about a deal, it advises the president to stop it. Two days later, on August 6, trump signed an executive order saying that tiktok posed a threat to the national security of the United States and would prohibit any U.S. individual or entity from conducting any transactions with tiktok and its Chinese parent company byte hopping after 45 days. On August 14, trump added a second executive order, requiring byte skipping to divest tiktok of all interests in U.S. operations within 90 days, and said the administrative order was based on an investigation by the US Foreign Investment Commission (CFIUS). < / P > < p > “we tried to communicate and solve problems with the U.S. government in good faith for nearly a year, but in the end we received a” ban order. “. We strongly oppose the US government’s position that tiktok poses a threat to national security. We will not easily sue the government, but we have no choice but to protect our community, our employees and ourselves. ” “We are not a national security threat, we have very strict data controls,” said papas, tiktok’s interim global head. Our team has built a world-class architecture with the primary and core concern of protecting our users. According to the Washington Post, trump signed an executive order against tiktok. The so-called facts are based on the review results of the US Foreign Investment Commission, and the legal basis is the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. < / P > < p > this is a federal law passed in 1977 that empowers the president of the United States to declare a state of emergency without the approval of Congress when the country is in an unusual and extremely serious threat situation. At the same time, a series of restrictive measures can be implemented, such as restricting transactions, freezing or confiscating assets, etc. Up to now, successive U.S. presidents have invoked the act 58 times, including imposing economic sanctions on Iran, Russia and other countries, and restricting capital transactions between them. During his three-year term of office, trump invoked the law six times, including the ban on tiktok. In 2019, during the Sino US trade friction, trump also cited the law to order American enterprises in China to leave China. < p > < p > secondly, the administrative order uses vague expressions such as “potential”, “possible” and “reported”, but does not provide the actual evidence that tiktok poses a real threat to national security and the state is in a state of emergency, which is not in line with the authorization premise set by the international economic emergency power law. < / P > < p > Third, the international economic emergency power law clearly stipulates that it is prohibited Administrative action prevents the communication and exchange of personal information, while the ban of tiktok is just a kind of restriction on personal communication and information material transmission. In the past three years, he has signed 182 executive orders, which is the largest number of executive orders signed each year in the past 40 years. Seven of them were prosecuted. < / P > < p > on January 27, 2017, trump just took office and signed an administrative order entitled “national protection plan to prevent foreign countries from entering the United States”: in the next 90 days, citizens of seven countries including Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Yemen and Libya are prohibited from entering the United States, which is called the “injunction” by the US media. One week after the executive order was signed, on February 3, 2017, U.S. Federal District Court Judge Robert robart suspended the controversial “order of prohibition” nationwide. < / P > < p > on March 6, 2017, trump amended the “prohibition order” to exclude people with green cards and visa in the travel ban. In more than a year, trump revised the “travel ban” twice. Finally, on June 26, 2018, the US Supreme Court passed the “travel ban” by a narrow margin of 5:4, which ended the 16 month judicial dispute. < / P > < p > the judge may decide to suspend Trump’s injunction against tiktok until the outcome of the lawsuit is reached. The federal government can appeal against this, but at least it can buy valuable time for tiktok. Of course, the opposite is possible: federal courts refuse to suspend tiktok’s injunction, and tiktok chooses to appeal. As for the lawsuit, CNBC, the US media, commented that although the chance of winning is not high, the practical significance of the lawsuit lies in that it can fight for more time, more rights and interests and more bargaining chips for itself through legal means. At the same time, byte beat also shows the attitude and determination of safeguarding rights and conveys confidence to the global market, investors and users. Chinese version of K-car: reading a10e design drawing exposure