Yesterday, an article called “takeaway rider, trapped in the system” hit the Internet. In addition to a deeper understanding of the riders distribution system of meituan and hungry Mo, readers also question the rationality of the delivery platform system. Up to now, hungry early morning said it would add new features, allowing outstanding riders to time out individual orders. But some netizens commented that this could not solve the fundamental problem. < p > < p > well known legal blogger @ talk about the views of the code, and express their own views on the “hungry” move. He said that the time limit for takeout delivery and the punishment rules for riders were set by such platforms themselves, but now they push conflicts and problems to consumers. Therefore, it seems that the new function of “humanization” will “overturn”. < / P > < p > Why are you hungry? It seems that the new function of “humanization” will “overturn” by public opinion? The reason is simple: are you hungry about the time limit for delivery and the punishment rules for riders? Such a platform has set up its own platform, but now it has pushed the contradictions and problems to the consumers. In the end, the consumers are unreasonable and unreasonable, so don’t you look for scolding? < / P > < p > of course, consumers want to order takeout as soon as possible. However, the process of each link needs time and cooperation. As a platform to meet the needs of consumers, the final pressure and problems are naturally put on the riders, so as to be harsh on riders and sacrifice the interests of riders to meet consumers and realize their own interests. Therefore, the root of the problem lies in the rules of the platform itself, rather than unreasonable consumers. < / P > < p > of course, from the legal point of view, ordering takeout is a contract behavior. Consumers, businesses and riders establish a contractual relationship through the platform. The provisions on delivery time are also part of the contract. If the delivery time is to be extended according to the actual situation, it is a change of the contract content. < / P > < p > in case of special circumstances, the consumer’s choice of “willing to wait 5 minutes or 10 minutes” is regarded as agreeing to change the delivery time in the contract, which is beyond reproach. However, this is the result of consensus of all parties, not determined by the platform side from the perspective of “Virgin Mary”. In fact, what is more needed is the platform. < / P > < p > of course, the takeout platform is a new thing, and a lot of rules and regulations need to be improved constantly. It is not terrible to have problems, but to acquiesce in the existence of problems and not to act. More Samsung devices can now run Android applications on PC through your phone