On October 20, 1997, the U.S. Department of Justice accused Microsoft of monopolizing the operating system and illegally bundled its browser and windows operating system. As a result, a series of protracted Microsoft antitrust cases, also known as Microsoft antitrust cases, were opened. In November 2002, Microsoft and the Ministry of justice reached a compromise. The settlement agreement included preventing Microsoft from participating in exclusive transactions that might harm competitors, and Microsoft agreed to disclose some technical data so that its competitors could write applications on windows. The market response to the complicated and unusual judicial war at that time was different. Some people thought that Microsoft won the victory because it was finally free from separation. However, there are also views that this is a victory for enterprises and consumers. It may be clear to Wall Street who wins more. On the day the settlement was approved, Microsoft’s share price soared and drove the shares of other technology stocks. < / P > < p > the anti-monopoly litigation around Microsoft has never stopped. Whether in Asia or the European Union, Microsoft has been accused of monopoly. However, it seems that the antitrust litigation that has been common to Microsoft has never affected its dominant position in the market. “Big fish eat small fish” is no exception in the market competition, but at the same time, the governments of various countries have never relaxed their pursuit of technology giants. On October 6, 2020, the judicial committee of the U.S. House of Representatives released a 449 page investigation report. After 16 months of investigation, it found that the four major technology enterprises in the United States had monopoly behavior. On October 20, the Department of justice and 11 U.S. States filed a monopoly lawsuit against Google, accusing the company of illegally using its monopoly position in the market to suppress competitors. The lawsuit is still in its early stage, and both sides hold their own opinions. According to the Justice Department, nearly 90% of the general search engine queries in the United States use Google, while on mobile devices, the proportion is closer to 95%. By paying billions of dollars a year to distributors, Google has controlled about 80% of the search distribution channels in the general search market in the United States. As a result, no one can challenge Google’s dominance in search and search advertising. Google said there were serious loopholes in the lawsuit and that people didn’t have to use Google, they chose to. So the lawsuit won’t help consumers in any way. The specific content of each major media has already been detailed, no longer do this elaboration. < p > < p > < p > this time, the Ministry of justice’s heavy attack is the first action against a technology giant since the crackdown on Microsoft more than 20 years ago, and also makes the “old memories” of Microsoft’s antitrust case constantly mentioned. It is hoped that this lawsuit can be compared with this one, and the potential outcome of the Google case can be predicted through the Microsoft case. At the same time, it can also be used for reference for the other three major technology giants, Facebook, Amazon and apple, which are also recognized by the U.S. government as having monopoly. There is a certain degree of comparability between Google and Microsoft. First of all, they are all U.S. technology giants, accounting for more than half of the market. Secondly, they have never lacked the experience of being sued, even transnational litigation. However, due to the migration of the background of the times, the analysis of Google’s antitrust case should also be placed in the current analysis alone. Give two aspects of analysis. < / P > < p > first, in terms of share price, Microsoft’s share price rose nearly 6% in the same year with the approval of the settlement agreement. On Tuesday, the share price of alphabet, the parent company of Google, rose after being sued by the Ministry of justice and rose more than 2% on Wednesday. The reason is that the lawsuit of the Ministry of justice is not sudden. The market has already fully analyzed the risks that Google will face in the lawsuit. The general conclusion is that even if the Justice Department wins, it will not reverse Google’s market leadership in many areas. According to Forbes’ analysis, antitrust litigation may bring more than $200 billion risk to the four major technology giants, including Google. But there are also views that the ownership of Google’s parent company alphabet should be changed from “buy” to “strong buy”, because the lawsuit will become a failure case for the Justice Department. So far this year, alphabet’s share price has outperformed the market, up 19% and 1.61% in the past five trading days. < / P > < p > Second, during the critical period of the U.S. presidential election, there are market views that the Department of justice’s prosecution is a political gesture, because the Attorney General of 11 states participating in the prosecution are all Republican, which may be a means for the Republican Party to compete for votes. It is a move that both parties are willing to use to express their views on the splitting of technology giants. It is true that the presidential election has already entered the white hot. The Department of justice’s antitrust litigation against Google and the other three technology giants will no doubt run through the election until the outcome of the next president. If Biden wins trump and wins the majority of the Senate, he will be in trouble for the four big technology giants, because this means more stringent anti trust laws, increased risk of separation and restrictions on takeover behavior. In early October, the house of Representatives, which reported monopolistic practices by the four major technology giants, was led by the government. This year’s US presidential election will have a huge impact on both history and economy, including the extent to which the four major technology giants will take risks in the future. If it wins, then new energy and other sectors are expected to perform strongly, while other sectors will be relatively depressed, especially the four major technology giants, which will face greater risk of being split up. Both Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren and Minnesota Senator Amy crosbach have targeted Facebook and Google. Elizabeth also said that if she won the election, it would be an urgent task to stop the monopoly of these giants. So if they win, the risk of technology giants being subject to more stringent scrutiny and litigation will only increase. < / P > < p > an enterprise with a virtuous business cycle will become bigger and stronger when it develops. However, it is difficult to balance the contradiction of preventing the enterprise from abusing its dominant position. Some economists believe that the traditional anti trust law is out of date. Now we should pay attention to the impact of innovation, consumer privacy and employment. But I think the purpose of antitrust is to protect competition, not competitors, and then protect the interests of consumers. For Google, whether its monopoly in search, advertising and other fields has long harmed consumers, consider every habit and detail we use Google search, and the answer is self-evident. The release and download schedule of Microsoft Flight Simulation varies from region to region

By ibmwl