A survey conducted by lademann & Associates, a research firm, found that three years after being fined $2.7 billion by the European Union, Google shopping, its shopping price comparison service, has not changed its business model and is still engaged in monopoly behavior. Commissioned by 25 shopping websites, lademann & Associates conducted a study that surveyed 10.5 billion hits. Research shows that less than 1% of the traffic through Google shopping is directed to rival websites such as kelkoo and IDEO. Thomas hoppner, an industry lawyer, said the comprehensive empirical study showed that Google was still undermining competition. < / P > < p > the study was conducted three years after Google agreed to adjust its Google shopping. In June 2017, the European Union announced a fine of 2.42 billion euros (about US $2.7 billion) on Google shopping. The reason is that Google favors its own service, Google shopping, and “downgrades the services of its competitors.”. < / P > < p > Google has appealed the EU’s ruling to the general court, the intermediate court of the European Union, and the results of the appeal are expected to be released by the end of this year. At the same time, Google also submitted to the European Commission plans to adjust Google shopping services to meet the EU’s anti-monopoly law. However, hopner said Google’s main search results (a key source of traffic) have not been affected by these changes so far. Mr. pythai claimed that “there is no remedy for the competition that he has taken.”. < / P > < p > in addition to the Google shopping service, two other Google services, Google Android and Google Adsense advertising services, have also been fined by EU antitrust, and Google has filed an appeal. The iPhone 12 keynote has been recorded in Apple park