On Wednesday, the Supreme Court ruled that it was self-employed workers, not riders. The decision came in a court case brought by a former employee of glovo, the most popular food distribution service in Spain, like deliveroo. &The relationship between the rider and the glovo business is professional in nature, the Supreme Court said in a statement. < / P > < p > glovo is one of many companies that take advantage of the crowdsourcing economy in the United States and the United Kingdom. It refers to those self-employed workers who are engaged in temporary and flexible jobs. For example, in this case, they deliver meals for customers, drive for transportation companies such as Uber, or deliver packages for e-commerce giants such as Amazon. < / P > < p > the court ruled that glovo is a firm that provides fixed conditions of service and has the assets necessary to carry out the services;. < / P > < p > although the text of the Supreme Court’s decision is still unknown, it may have a profound impact on the whole crowdsourcing economy. The court held that glovo was not a simple intermediary between the restaurant and the delivery rider, but an enterprise that provided fixed conditions of service and possessed the necessary assets to carry out the service;. These assets include mobile apps, which riders must own if they want to find a job. < / P > < p > the decision marks an important step in a long legal struggle for workers in the crowdsourcing economy, in which several lower courts have ruled in favor of meal riders, but have been overturned by higher district courts. The case went to the Supreme Court after Isaac cuende, a former glovo employee, appealed against a decision of the Madrid high court, which held that the meal rider was a self-employed worker. In order to unify the court’s response to this issue, the head of the Madrid high court decided to send the next relevant case to all 17 judges of the labour department. In this case, the judges considered the meal rider to be an employee. The ruling is very important for two reasons: on the one hand, it comes at a time when there is a constant dispute over the issue of the work status of the rider, and on the other hand, under the circumstances that the government plans to further regulate the industry. < / P > < p > in recent years, some workers employed to deliver goods through apps such as glovo have been demanding that they be paid employees, and petition for sick leave, paid leave and other corresponding rights. In a statement, glovo said it respected the court’s ruling but hoped that the government and the European Union would establish a regulatory framework. &Quot; glovo firmly believes that this regulation must be promoted on the basis of dialogue among all relevant actors. &The statement said. Google said the proposed media negotiation rules would put its free services in Australia at “risk”