According to reports, the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee held a hearing on Wednesday to discuss how to amend the law, known as section 230, used to exempt technology companies from platform liability. In his opening statement, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg urged Congress to amend the law “to make sure it works,” including improving the transparency of content censorship. < p > < p > twitter CEO Jack Dorsey’s speech focused on how Internet companies can regain public trust about content deletion standards, such as making the content review process public. Alphabet CEO sandar pichaie outlined how Google’s services can create value for users and stressed that only under the protection of 230 items can Google provide these services. The hearing is part of a discussion by the House Commerce Committee on whether to amend section 230. “230” was born in 1996, stipulating that Internet companies do not have to be sued for hosting, deleting or censoring users’ content. At present, both parties in the United States want to repeal or weaken this provision, while the Silicon Valley lobby is against it. Earlier, commission chairman Roger wicker announced that the “free pass” provided by law should be terminated. < / P > < p > previously exposed written testimony also shows that CEOs of Facebook, twitter and Google have different attitudes on how to revise 230 items. In his written testimony, Zuckerberg called on Congress to “update” the legal provision. Dorsey believes that legislators should be “restrained” in adjusting rules. Mr Pi also encouraged caution. In his written testimony, Dorsey adopted a cautious tone, calling on members of the Senate Commerce Committee to think twice before pushing forward “comprehensive legislation” to subvert the current business model of the Internet. Although he did not name them, he said the change to “230” could benefit larger peers because they have more resources to ensure compliance with the new terms. “Shaking the foundation of 230 articles may subvert the way we communicate on the Internet, and only a few large, well funded technology companies can survive,” he wrote In his written testimony, pichaie also called for the Commission to “consider carefully any amendments to section 230, and fully understand the possible consequences of these amendments for businesses and users.”. Zuckerberg also warned that the complete abolition of 230 articles could have unintended consequences, leading to “more scrutiny of content and avoidance of legal risk” on the platform. However, he expressed support for Congress to amend the law. “230 items make possible the development of mainstream Internet services and ensure that important values such as openness and openness become part of the way the platform operates,” he said. It will be an important decision to amend the law. However, I think Congress should amend this law to ensure that it works as intended. ” Zuckerberg also said he supported legislation to improve transparency in content decision-making and efforts to strengthen industry cooperation. Dorsey said it supported legislation requiring companies to publish “review processes and specific actions.”. < p > < p > Republicans have long argued that Internet companies are biased against conservatives. In written testimony, however, the CEOs of these technology companies reiterated that they would not make decisions based on political positions. The iPhone 12 keynote has been recorded in Apple park